我试图遵循hello world的例子。使用常规的ActiveMQ它可以工作，但是ActiveMQ Artemis让我头疼。我想我没有正确地进行一些配置。地址是制作的，但是它是使用多播路由制作的。我想我需要单播（队列路由）。
下面的代码片段不适用于ActiveMQ的artemis版本。我正在尝试做的事情可能吗？我想自动创建一个持久的队列。
public class SimpleAmqpTest
{
[Fact]
public async Task TestHelloWorld()
{
Address address = new Address("amqp://guest:guest@localhost:5672");
Connection connection = await Connection.Factory.CreateAsync(address);
Session session = new Session(connection);
Message message = new Message("Hello AMQP");
var target = new Target
{
Address = "simple-queue",
Durable = 1,
};
SenderLink sender = new SenderLink(session, "sender-link", target, null);
await sender.SendAsync(message);
ReceiverLink receiver = new ReceiverLink(session, "receiver-link", "simple-queue");
message = await receiver.ReceiveAsync();
receiver.Accept(message);
await sender.CloseAsync();
await receiver.CloseAsync();
await session.CloseAsync();
await connection.CloseAsync();
}
}
终于发现我做错了什么，因为Amqp没有队列和主题的配置，所以它可以在功能中定义。出于某种原因，Artemis默认创建主题（多播）。如果您需要AnyCast，您可以使用Cap能力=new Symbol[]{new Symbol（"队列"）}指定您的需求。对于完整的测试事实：
public async Task TestHelloWorld()
{
//strange, works using regular activeMQ and the amqp test broker from here: http://azure.github.io/amqpnetlite/articles/hello_amqp.html
//but this does not work in ActiveMQ Artemis
Address address = new Address("amqp://guest:guest@localhost:5672");
Connection connection = await Connection.Factory.CreateAsync(address);
Session session = new Session(connection);
Message message = new Message("Hello AMQP");
Target target = new Target
{
Address = "q1",
Capabilities = new Symbol[] { new Symbol("queue") }
};
SenderLink sender = new SenderLink(session, "sender-link", target, null);
sender.Send(message);
Source source = new Source
{
Address = "q1",
Capabilities = new Symbol[] { new Symbol("queue") }
};
ReceiverLink receiver = new ReceiverLink(session, "receiver-link", source, null);
message = await receiver.ReceiveAsync();
receiver.Accept(message);
await sender.CloseAsync();
await receiver.CloseAsync();
await session.CloseAsync();
await connection.CloseAsync();
}
